“ You can't improve what you don't measure. ”William Thomson (Lord Kelvin)
We want to implement the largest global network of biodiversity sensors. What are you waiting for? Join us?
Why measure biodiversity?
Biodiversity is fundamental for life on Earth. Monitoring biodiversity is essential to understand the impact of human activities on the environment and to adopt effective conservation measures.
What is bioacoustics?
Bioacoustics is the science that studies the sounds produced by living organisms and their use for monitoring and research purposes. By using advanced audio recording devices, researchers can capture sounds emitted by animals, such as birds, insects, and mammals, in natural environments.
These sounds are then analyzed to identify the species present, monitor their activity, and obtain information on ecosystem dynamics. Bioacoustics is a powerful and non-invasive tool that allows to collect valuable data on biodiversity without disturbing the organisms studied.
Why use bioacoustics?
Bioacoustics is an innovative and versatile technology that offers numerous advantages for biodiversity monitoring and ecosystem conservation. Here are some of the main reasons:
Use cases of Ecocanto
A pricing suitable for every type of company or institution
Ecocanto offers a range of flexible subscription plans to meet the biodiversity monitoring needs of companies, institutions, and organizations.
Monthly payment in advance.
One sensor, for small companies or bird lovers.
€300,00 /sensor
€100,00 /month
From two to five sensors, for companies with multiple sites to monitor.
€270,00 /sensor
€90,00 /month
More than five sensors, for resellers, ESG professionals or consultants.
€250,00 /sensor
€70,00 /month
Annual payment in advance.
One sensor, for small companies or bird lovers.
€300,00 /sensor
From two to five sensors, for companies with multiple sites to monitor.
€270,00 /sensor
More than five sensors, for resellers, ESG professionals or consultants.
€250,00 /sensor
Stay up to date on events, initiatives and opportunities and receive the latest news and special offers directly in your email inbox.
Order request
Fill in all the information below. You will be contacted by one of our operators as soon as possible.
Scientific literature
Our research and development team has conducted an in-depth study to ensure that our tools are based on solid scientific foundations. Below are some of the sources we have used.
Izsák, J., Papp, L. (2000)
This article discusses the connection between traditional ecological diversity indices and measures of biodiversity. It introduces the quadratic entropy index, which considers both species differences and their abundances, bridging traditional concepts of ecological diversity and modern biodiversity measures.
Scholes, R. J., Biggs, R. (2005)
The authors propose a Biodiversity Intactness Index (BII) to assess the state of biodiversity on a large geographic scale. The BII measures the average abundance of a set of organisms in a geographic area, providing a tool to monitor biodiversity loss at regional and global levels.
Gotelli, N. J., Colwell, R. K. (2001)
This article examines methodologies for quantifying biodiversity, focusing on procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. The authors discuss various biodiversity indices and provide guidelines for their application.
Fairbrass, A. J., Rennett, J., Williams, C., Titheridge, H. (2018)
The authors present CityNet, a set of deep learning tools for urban ecoacoustic assessment. The system uses acoustic recordings to monitor biodiversity in urban areas, demonstrating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in biodiversity conservation.
Wakassa, S., Mounir, M., Squallic, W., Mansouri, I., Dbibae, Y., Hmidani, M., Chellik, S., Douini, I., El Youssi, M., El Azzouzi, M. (2023)
This study analyzes avifaunal diversity and natural ecosystems in the Central High Atlas of Morocco, highlighting the ecotouristic potential. The results show a rich bird biodiversity, suggesting that these areas could be used for sustainable ecotourism activities.
Harris, S. A., Shears, N. T., Radford, C. A. (2015)
The authors explore the use of ecoacoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity on temperate reefs. The study demonstrates that recorded sounds can provide valuable information on species diversity and ecosystem health in marine environments.
Hillebrand, H., Blasius, B., Borer, E. T., Chase, J. M., Downing, J. A. (2017)
This article analyzes how changes in biodiversity are not necessarily linked to species richness trends. The authors discuss the implications of this decoupling for conservation strategies, suggesting the need for more comprehensive biodiversity measures.
Marcos, M. (2021)
This document provides guidelines on best practices for long-term ecological monitoring. It includes methodologies and approaches to ensure the collection of reliable data and the ongoing assessment of ecosystem health.
Alcocer, J., Escobar-Briones, E. (2022)
The authors conduct a meta-analysis on the use of acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity. The results show that acoustic indices can be effective tools for monitoring and assessing biodiversity in various environments.
Michele, D., Teixeira, J., Squalli, W. (2019)
This study examines the Mediterranean Basin as a biodiversity hotspot, analyzing the challenges and opportunities for conservation. The authors discuss strategies to protect this ecologically rich and threatened region.
Some of our devices
Click on one of the devices below to see it in action.
SP141, 24047 Treviglio (BG)
Via Edmondo de Amicis, 4, 24047 Treviglio (BG)
Via Don Luigi Giussani, 10, 24047 Treviglio (BG)
Via S. Michele, 24, 24047 Treviglio (BG)
Via S. Michele, 24, 24047 Treviglio (BG)